Cross reaction and forensic comparison of blood testing done by private and public sector laboratories

Christian Stadler, Claudemir Rodrigues Dias Filho, Maria Gabriela Roca

Resumo


Blood evidence consists of one of the most important forensic pieces. However, it is not always easy to identify a stain as blood. The best and fastest way of doing so, is by using rapid screening derived from immunochromatographic tests to spot hemoglobin. However, cross reaction between species might be an issue since hemoglobin of other animals could be present, especially considering crimes against fauna, outdoor crime scenes with an easy access for animals, and human and domestic animal trauma cases. According to the particular structure in each country there are private and/or public laboratories working in this field. Methods and resources from private and public sectors are different, and procedures also differ from country to country. The main objective of our work was to validate the presence of human blood using interspecific samples and the criteria defined by each lab using rapid blood detection test kits from the public sector related to forensic analysis in Brazil and from the private sector in Germany. As a secondary goal, we have evaluated sensibility, the Hook Effect and pH effect in some commercially available kits. Our results showed that the tests carried out are suitable for the detection of human blood in forensic samples using methods commonly employed in the public and private sectors.

Palavras-chave


Human blood identification; Hemoglobin; High Dose Hook effect; Immunochromatographic tests; Rapid screening tests

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências


A.F.B. Andrade, M.E.C.G. Siqueira, L.C. Arantes, L.S. Queiroz, R.L.V. Silva, E.D. Ramalho. Forensic Identification of Human Blood: comparison of two one-step presumptive tests for blood screening of crime scene samples. Rev. Bras. Crimin. 3(1), 12-15, 2014.

S. Dodig. Interferences in quantitative immunochemical methods Interferences in quantitative immunochemical methods. Biochem. Med. 19(1), 50-62, 2009.

D. Hemon, M. Shpitzen, C. Oz, B. Glattstein, M. Aroury, R. Gafny. The use of Hexagon OBTI test for detection of human blood at crime scene and on itens of evidence part I: Validation studies and implementation. J. Forensic Identif. 53(5), 566-575, 2003.

M.N. Hochmeister, B, Budowle, R. Sparkes, O. Rudin, C. Gehrig, M. Thali, L. Schmidt, A. Cordier, L. Dirnhofer. Validation studies of an immunochromatographic 1-Step Test for the forensic identification of human blood. J. Forensic Sci. 44(3), 597-602, 1999.

P. Longo, C.R. Dias Filho, M.P.O. Valadares, E.C. Alonso, S.P.S. Gonçalves, E. Auler-Bittencourt. Avaliação Comparativa de Teste Imunocromatográfico para Identificação Forense de Sangue Humano. Rev. Bras. Crimin. 1(1), 16-21, 2011.

A. Misensik, D. Laux. Validation Study of the Seratec HemDirect Hemoglobin. Assay for the Forensic Identification of Human Blood. MAFS Newsletter Spring, MAFS Spring Board Meeting.18-25, 2007.

J. Di Francesco, J. Sutton. Re-evaluation of the Seratec PSA Semiquant test: comparison of kit provided buffer with phosphate buffer saline. Can. Soc. Forensic Sci. J. 48(3), 1-15, 2015.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15260/rbc.v6i2.169

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.